Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 600 So. 2d 134 - State v. Stills

600 So. 2d 134 - State v. Stills’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
January 2008
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 433 So. 2d 688 - State v. Smith · 433 So. 2d 104 - State v. Square · State v. Hudgins · 354 So. 2d 1332 - State v. Schwartz · 535 So. 2d 1024 - State v. Madison

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A mistrial may be ordered, and in a jury case the jury dismissed when: (1) The defendant consents thereto; (2) The jury is unable to agree upon a verdict; (3) There is a legal defect in the proceedings which would make any judgment entered upon a verdict reversible as a matter of law; (4) the court finds that the defendant does not have the mental capacity to proceed; (5) It is physically impossible to proceed with the trial in conformity with law; or (6) False statements of a juror on voir dire prevent a fair trial. Upon motion of a defendant, a mistrial shall be ordered, and in a jury case the jury dismissed, when prejudicial conduct in or outside the courtroom makes it impossible for the defendant to obtain a fair trial, or when authorized by Article 770. . . .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.