Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 600 SO2D 138 - Richardson v. Reeves

Richardson v. Reeves’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
September 2012
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently September 2012

10 state decisions

50199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on in the Matter of the Application of Ramon Baez · 512 So. 2d 1165 - St. Charles Parish School Bd. v. GAF Corp. · Verdun v. Scallon Brothers Contractors, Inc. · 381 So. 2d 441 - League of Women Voters v. City of New Orleans · State v. Beck

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “to assert an action, a plaintiff must have a real and actual interest in the action asserted. LSA-C.C.P. art. 681; Cox Cable New Orleans, Inc. v. City of New Orleans, 624 So.2d 890, 895 (La.1993); Byrd v. International Paper Company, 594 So.2d at 962. [ Byrd v. International Paper Company, 594 So.2d 961, 962 (La.App. 3rd Cir.1992).] Standing is a concept utilized to determine if a party is sufficiently affected so as to ensure that a justiciable controversy is presented to the court. The requirement of standing is satisfied if it can be said that the plaintiff has a legally protectible and tangible interest at stake in the litigation. Richardson v. Reeves, 600 So.2d 138, 140 (La.App. 2nd Cir.1992). In other words, standing requires that the plaintiff have an adequate interest in himself, which the law recognizes, against a defendant having a substantial adverse interest.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “In such circumstances, the matter is now moot, as this court will not review a case where only injunctive relief is sought when the need for that relief has ceased to be a justiciable issue. Injunction, may be used to prevent but not to correct the wrong; it cannot be employed to redress an alleged consummated wrong or undo what has already been done.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “trial court was not obligated to rule on plaintiff's motion for leave to amend, prior to ruling on defendants' motions for summary judgment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.