Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 600 So. 2d 214 - Ex Parte Fuller

600 So. 2d 214 - Ex Parte Fuller’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
June 2013
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently June 2013

12 state decisions

50199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 543 So. 2d 682 - Ex Parte Edgar · 397 So. 2d 98 - Ex Parte Dorsey Trailers, Inc. · Lowe v. Nationwide Ins. Co. · Bozeman v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. · Twentieth Century Marketing, Inc. v. Taylor

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Usually uninsured and underinsured motorist coverage gives the insurer a contract right to be in an adversarial position to the insured, for the insurer (1) can be joined as a defendant by the insured (subject to the insurer's right to elect not to participate in the trial but to be bound by the factfinder's decisions on issues of liability and damages) or (2) can intervene as a party adverse to its insured.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[a] petition for a writ of mandamus will be granted to compel discovery if a clear abuse of discretion is shown.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “no affidavits, memorandums, or reports to support the [objecting parties' contentions],”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.