Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 600 SO2D 32 - Johnson v. State

Johnson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
October 2000
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Robertson v. Methow Valley Citizens Council · Alimeg, Inc. v. Shlim · 457 So. 2d 481 - State v. Neil · 522 So. 2d 18 - State v. Slappy · 486 So. 2d 565 - State v. Castillo

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Assuming, without deciding, that the trial court properly exercised its discretion in consolidating these cases for jury selection, see United States v. Quesada-Bonilla, 952 F.2d 597, 599 (1st Cir.1991), and cases cited therein, we find that the trial court erred in overruling defense counsel's objection to representing multiple clients during jury selection. "To deny a motion for separate representation, where a risk of conflicting interests exists, is reversible error." Foster v. State, 387 So.2d 344, 345 (Fla. 1980).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[a] prospective juror's occupation is not a valid reason for challenge unless there is some connection between the occupation and the facts of the case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.