Dill v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
134 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 137 later decisions — most recently April 2018 · most notably Ex Parte Dill (1992), 778 So. 2d 199 - Hyde v. State (1998)
134 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · United States v. Young · Lockett v. Ohio · Darden v. Wainwright · Pate v. Robinson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 137 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'the failure to object to improper prosecutorial arguments . . . should be weighed as part of our evaluation of the claim on the merits because of its suggestion that the defense did not consider the comments in question to be particularly harmful.'”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“'A trial judge may refuse to charge on a lesser included offense when it is clear to the judicial mind that there is no evidence to support the jury's being charged on the lesser included offense.'”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“' " 'is to be "used sparingly, solely in those circumstances in which a miscarriage of justice would otherwise result.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Hunt v. State · Russell v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.