Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 600 SO2D 405 - Savage v. State

Savage v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
September 2015
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently September 2015

7 state decisions

30199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · United States v. Bagley · Sexton v. State · Ex Parte Dickerson · 578 So. 2d 1089 - Ex Parte Cammon

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The knowledge of government agents working on the case, including a deputy sheriff, as to the existence of exculpatory evidence will be imputed to the prosecutor. Sexton v. State , 529 So.2d 1041 , 1045 (Ala.Cr.App. 1988).”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"[E]vidence is material only if there is a reasonable probability that, had the evidence been disclosed to the defense, the result of the proceeding would have been different. A 'reasonable probability' is a probability sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.