Germany v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
February 2000
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 366 So. 2d 740 - Temple v. State · Johnson v. State · 534 So. 2d 1126 - Perry v. State · 494 So. 2d 804 - Shaneyfelt v. State · 414 So. 2d 157 - Etheridge v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"To establish possession, the State must prove: 1) actual or potential control, 2) intention to exercise dominion, and 3) an external manifestation of intent and control. Eady v. State , 495 So.2d 1161 (Ala.Cr.App. 1986). 'Where constructive possession is relied on the State must also prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the accused knew of the presence of the prohibited substance.' Temple v. State , 366 So.2d 740 , 741 (Ala.Cr.App. 1978)."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.