Ikner v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1623
Relies on Burks v. United States · Hildebrand v. Social Security Administration · Logiudice v. Georgia · Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. Russell · Sobell v. Attorney General
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““A statement is ‘material,’ regardless of the admissibility of the statement under the rules of evidence, if it could have affected the course or outcome of the official proceeding. It is no defense that the de-clarant mistakenly believed the falsification to be immaterial. Whether a falsification is material in a given factual situation is a question of law.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Fort v. State““A person commits the crime of perjury in the first degree when in any official proceeding he swears falsely and his false statement is material to the proceeding in which it is made.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Fort v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.