600 So. 2d 448 - Insley v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
July 1995
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · Ex Parte Branch · City of Lockport v. United States · 571 So. 2d 1270 - Harrell v. State · 555 So. 2d 263 - Harrell v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"A defendant cannot prove a prima facie case of purposeful discrimination solely from the fact that the prosecutor struck one or more blacks from his jury. A defendant must offer some evidence in addition to the striking of blacks that would raise an inference of discrimination. When the evidence shows only that blacks were struck and that a greater percentage of blacks sat on the jury than sat on the lawfully established venire, an inference of discrimination has not been created."”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Yeomans v. State“respectfully decline[d] to give [his] reasons on the record”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.