Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

600 So. 2d 45

Schweim v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1992-06-19

Relies on 592 So. 2d 767 - Tillman v. State · 593 So. 2d 289 - Alvarez v. State

Decided 1992-06-19

PER CURIAM.

¶1The appellant’s judgment and sentence, including the imposition of court costs, is affirmed. We approve that portion of Condition Six of the appellant’s probation that states “You will not use any illegal drugs.” However, we direct that the remaining portion of Condition Six be stricken. See Tillman v. State, 592 So.2d 767 (Fla. 2d DCA *461992); Alvarez v. State, 593 So.2d 289 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992).

SCHOONOVER, C.J., and HALL and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.
/600/so2d/45 · .json · Public domain