Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 600 SO2D 771 - Guy v. Guy

Guy v. Guy’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
3
states following
July 2016
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently July 2016

7 state decisions

30199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on French v. Wolf

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “for the purpose of calculating Mr. Kelly's child support obligation under the guidelines. However, that is not to say that the personal injury settlement received by Mr. Kelly should not be considered at all or that the trial court erred in considering those monies, if they were so considered. We find that the proper way to account for these funds as articulated by the court in Guy , which stated: We agree that capital assets should be considered by the trial judge in determining the appropriate child support due, but not in the calculating of”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The income from any source, including but not limited to salaries, wages, commissions, bonuses, dividends, severance pay, pensions, interest, trust income, annuities, capital gains, social security benefits, worker's compensation benefits, unemployment insurance benefits, disability insurance benefits, and spousal support received from a preexisting spousal support obligation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “, and life insurance proceeds are not income. Thereafter, capital may be considered by the trial court to determine if deviation from the guidelines is appropriate. Guy, 600 So.2d at 774 . Therefore, in finding that the amount paid to Mr. Kelly to settle his personal injury case was not”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.