Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 600 SW2D 234 - Freeman v. Thompson

Freeman v. Thompson’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
May 2011
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently May 2011

4 state decisions

2019791980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Stevenson v. Ewing · Hohenberg Bros. Co. v. Missouri Pacific Railroad · Mascari v. Raines · Whitley v. White · 24 Tenn. App. 688 - Easterly v. Myers

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “agreement was tainted with illegality and is part of the overall scheme to get around the anti-rebate statutes of the State of Tennessee”); cf. Hoyt v. Hoyt, 213 Tenn. 117, 127 , 372 S.W.2d 300, 304 (1963) (observing that”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.