Frazier v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently February 1991
12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Burks v. United States · Greene v. Massey · 68 Tex. Crim. 295 - Burford v. State · Henry v. Phillips · Texas Co. v. Lee
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Batten down the hatches. The majority, with their disdain for precedent, stare decisis and revocation proceedings in particular, are headed for `greater' things. They are only laying the foundation for extending the rule narrowly adopted today to all criminal trials. Let there be no mistake, and let the bench and bar beware of what is coming.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Chambers v. State“`Hearsay is without probative value, even if admitted without objection. (Citations omitted). It constitutes no evidence, and will not be considered in determining the sufficiency of the evidence.' (Citations omitted).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Chambers v. State“[H]earsay evidence has no probative value.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Chambers v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.