Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 600 SW2D 367 - Davis v. Aquila, Inc.

Davis v. Aquila, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
October 1981
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Dairyland County Mutual Insurance Co. of Texas v. Harrison · Moore v. White · Compu-Center, Inc. v. Compubill, Inc. · Frost v. Molina · United Plastics, Co. v. Dyes

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““. . . that plaintiff, in order to prove that defendant had done business in the county of suit for purposes of Section 17.56 of the DTPA, had to show that defendant had performed either a series of acts in the county of suit for the purpose of realizing pecuniary benefit, or a single act with the intention of initiating a series of such acts.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.