Adickes v. Andreoli’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently March 2012
2 federal appellate · 8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 77B (§ 2 of the Securities Act of 1933)
Relies on Securities & Exchange Commission v. W. J. Howey Co. · Thigpen v. Locke · Brown v. Cole · Russell v. Industrial Transp. Co. · Russell v. Industrial Transportation Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“whether the contract would have been signed by the plaintiff without such misrepresentations having been made.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,739, 14 Ucc rep.serv.2d 336 J.B. Haralson, Cross-Appellants v. The E.F. Hutton Group, Inc., Cross-Appellees. The E.F. Hutton Group, Inc., Cross-Appellees v. George J. Aubin, Cross-Appellants · In Re Sioux, Ltd., Securities Litigation v. Coopers & Lybrand, First Small Business Investment Co. Of California v. Butler, Binion, Rice & Knapp, Coopers & Lybrand, Republic Venture Group, Inc. v. Butler, Binion, Rice & Knapp, Coopers & Lybrand
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.