Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 601 A2D 60 - Trerotola v. Cotter

Trerotola v. Cotter’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
April 2015
most recently cited

9 district · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently April 2015

9 district · 5 state decisions

100199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on International Shoe Co. v. Washington · World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. Woodson · Hanson v. Denckla · McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp. · Kulko v. Superior Court of California in and for City and County of San Francisco

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(a) A District of Columbia court may exercise personal jurisdiction over a person, who acts directly or by an agent, as to a claim for relief arising from the person's— (1) transacting any business in the District of Columbia; (b) When jurisdiction over a person is based solely on this section, only a claim for relief arising from acts enumerated in this section may be asserted against him.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “a discernible relationship to the business transacted in the District.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “For proper jurisdiction, therefore, the long-arm statute requires that the claim raised have a discernible relationship to the “business” transacted in the District .... The critical test is whether the nonresident’s “conduct and connection with the forum state are such that he [or she] should reasonably anticipate being haled into court there.” World-Wide Volkswagen, supra, 444 U.S. at 297 , 100 S.Ct. 559 , quoted in Smith, supra, 452 A.2d at 336 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.