United States v. Walker’s Empirical Analysis
601 F.2d 1051 · 1979
Citation profile
68 federal appellate · 1 district · 6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 96 later decisions — most recently November 2017 · most notably Kruso v. International Telephone & Telegraph Corp. (1989), Clipper Exxpress v. Rocky Mountain Motor Tariff Bureau (1982)
68 federal appellate · 1 district · 6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 18 U.S.C. § 3282
Relies on Foman v. Davis · Rochin v. People of California · United States v. Lovasco · Mooney v. Holohan · United States v. Healy
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 96 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Rule 10(e) cannot be used to add to or enlarge the record on appeal to include material which was not before the district court.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Errors in the trial court may be most speedily corrected by the trial judge ... [and a] motion for reconsideration may, in some instances, avoid the necessity of an appeal.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“We are here concerned only with the record before the trial judge when his decision was made.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.