Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 601 F.2d 1184 - In re Carroll

In re Carroll’s Empirical Analysis

601 F.2d 1184 · 1979

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
May 2017
most recently cited

1 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 35 U.S.C. § 103 · 35 U.S.C. § 112

Relies on Graham v. John Deere Company of Kansas City Calmar Inc · In re Chilowsky · In re Lindell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “One of the more difficult aspects of resolving questions of non-obviousness is the necessity 'to guard against slipping into use of hindsight.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.