Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 601 F.3d 1279 - Yorkey v. Diab

Yorkey v. Diab’s Empirical Analysis

601 F.3d 1279 · 2010

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
September 2023
most recently cited

2 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 35 U.S.C. § 112

Relies on Consolidated Edison Co of New York v. National Labor Relations Board · Mahurkar v. C.R. Bard, Inc. · Cooper v. Goldfarb · Wang Laboratories, Inc. v. Toshiba Corp. · Martek Biosciences Corp. v. Nutrinova, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he Board was well within its discretion to give more credibility to [one expert's] testimony over [another expert's testimony] unless no reasonable trier of fact could have done so.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.