Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 601 F.3d 189 - In re Roman

In re Roman’s Empirical Analysis

601 F.3d 189 · 2010

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
March 2017
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Theard v. United States · In Re Robert J Snyder · Selling v. Radford · Matter of Cooperman · In re Bithoney

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “An attorney may be subject to discipline or other corrective measures for any act or omission that violates the rules of professional conduct or responsibility of the state or other jurisdiction where the attorney maintains his or her principal office.... An attorney also may be subject to discipline or other corrective measures for any failure to comply with a Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure, a Local Rule of the Court, an order or other instruction of the Court, or a rule of professional conduct or responsibility of the Court, or any other conduct unbecoming a member of the bar.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “reflect{s] a rebuttable presumption that the reciprocal discipline imposed by this Court will be identical-or as close to identical as our rules and the circumstances permit-to the discipline imposed by the prior court or other disciplinary authority.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.