Claudio v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis
601 F.3d 316 · 2010
Citation profile
4 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1227 (§ 237 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Omari v. Holder · Abebe v. Mukasey · Ramani v. Ashcroft · Hassan v. Gonzales · Hoxha v. Holder
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“that brief becomes the operative document through which any issues that a petitioner wishes to have considered must be raised.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Vazquez v. Sessions“the alien has exhausted all administrative remedies available to the alien as of right.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.