Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 601 F.3d 842 - Zutz v. Nelson

Zutz v. Nelson’s Empirical Analysis

601 F.3d 842 · 2010

Citation profile

89
cited by 89 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
June 2025
most recently cited

18 federal appellate · 33 district · 3 state decisions

Appellate journey

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1367 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Paul v. Davis · Migra v. Warren City School District Board of Education · Morton v. Becker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 89 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “To survive a motion to dismiss, a complaint must contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face. Thus, although a complaint need not include detailed factual allegations, a plaintiffs obligation to provide the grounds of his entitlement to relief requires more than labels and conclusions, and a formulaic recitation of the elements of a cause of action will not do.”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “could not withstand a motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[I]n reviewing a denial of leave to amend we ask whether the proposed amended complaint states a cause of action under the [ Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly , 550 U.S. 544 , 127 S.Ct. 1955 , 167 L.Ed.2d 929 (2007),] pleading standard ....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.