Eneh v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis
601 F.3d 943 · 2010
Citation profile
4 federal appellate ·
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Nevada District Court)
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Wakkary v. Holder · Navaratwam Kamalthas v. Immigration and Naturalization Service · Li Chen Zheng v. Ashcroft · Nuru v. Gonzales · Hosseini v. Gonzales
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Based on the record before us, we agree with the Immigration Judge that the respondent is subject to removal from the United States based on ... his record of convictions which rise to the level of being a particularly] serious crime (Exh. 2).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Delgado v. Holder“[W]e find that the BIA misapplied its own precedent .... Accordingly, we grant [the] petition for review and remand to the BIA for further proceedings.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Szonyi v. Whitaker
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.