Druley v. Patton’s Empirical Analysis
2015
Citation profile
2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1292 · 28 U.S.C. § 636 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Farmer v. Brennan · City of Cleburne Texas v. Cleburne Living Center · Garza v. Davis · Supre v. Ricketts · Brown v. Zavaras
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“presented no evidence that the ... defendants failed to consider the WPATH's flexible guidelines, failed to make an informed judgment as to the hormone treatment level appropriate for her, or otherwise deliberately ignored her serious medical needs[,]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Oakleaf v. Martinez“an informed judgment as to the appropriate form of treatment and did not deliberately ignore plaintiff's medical needs.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Oakleaf v. Martinez“) ). ( Id. (citing Doc. 211 ¶¶ 13-14).) The World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH),”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Oakleaf v. Martinez
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.