Cintas Corp. v. Unite Here’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
1 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1114 (§ 32 of the Trademark Act of 1946 (Lanham Act)) · 15 U.S.C. § 1125 (§ 43 of the Trademark Act of 1946 (Lanham Act)) · 18 U.S.C. § 1951 (Hobbs Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 1952 · 18 U.S.C. § 1961 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 1962 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1367
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Sedima Sprl v. Imrex Company Inc · ATSI Communications, Inc. v. Shaar Fund, Ltd. · United States v. Enmons · Polaroid Corp. v. Polarad Electronics Corp.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.