Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

601 N.E.2d 327

In re Walker

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided September 11, 1992

Indiana Supreme Court · decided 1992-09-11

Relies on Matter of Walker

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1992-09-11

How this case has been cited

Cited by 52 later decisions — most recently October 2016 · most notably Rice v. Strunk (1996), Logan v. Commercial Union Insurance (1996)

6 federal appellate · 38 state decisions

350199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER AMENDING DATE OF SANCTION

¶2Comes now the Respondent in this proceeding, Max K. Walker, Jr., and requests that the previously imposed disciplinary sanction of a sixty day suspension from the practice of law be amended or that, in the alternative, the date of suspension commence on September 14, 1992.

¶3Upon examination of this matter, this Court reaffirms its decision to suspend the Respondent from the practice of law for a period of sixty days, but finds that such suspension should commence on September 14, 1992.

¶4IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED by this Court that our opinion of August 21, 1992, 597 N.E.2d 1271, suspending Respondent from the practice of law for a period of sixty (60) days is amended to provide that such suspension shall commence on September 14, 1992.

¶5The Clerk of this Court is directed to forward a copy of this Order to the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission, to the Respondent, and all parties who received the initial order of suspension.

GIVAN, DICKSON, and KRAHULIK, JJ., approve this order.SHEPARD, C.J., and DeBRULER, J., dissent and would deny relief.
/601/ne2d/327 · .json · Public domain