Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 601 P2D 178 - Goodman v. State

Goodman v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

42
cited by 42 later decisions
5
states following
September 2022
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 41 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently September 2022 · most notably Hopkinson v. State (1981), Grabill v. State (1980)

1 federal appellate · 41 state decisions

240197919801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Starnes v. Penrod Drilling Co. · Federal Energy Administration v. Algonquin SNG, Inc. · United States v. Unicorn Enterprises, Inc. · Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education · 46 Ill. 2d 348 - The People v. Hairston

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"Relevant evidence” means evidence having any tendency to make the existence of any fact that is of consequence to the determination of the action more probable or less probable than it would be without the evidence.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “[I]ntent in criminal cases is often an element of the charged crime.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “"* * * Objection should be made at the time of allegedly prejudicial comments so that the trial court will have an opportunity to take corrective action. [Citations.]" Goodman v. State, Wyo., 601 P.2d 178, 187 (1979).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.