Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 601 P2D 999 - Craver v. Craver

Craver v. Craver’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
2
states following
December 2007
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently December 2007

18 state decisions

1401979198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Warren v. Warren · Glover v. Berger · Holly Sugar Corporation v. Perez · Jelly v. Dabney · Lovejoy v. Lovejoy

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"... that the trial court may deny a continuance if the problem which gives rise to the request for a continuance is the fault of the party moving for the continuance." Craver v. Craver, supra, 601 P.2d at 1000.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““ * * * we must, on appeal, assume that the evidence in favor of the successful party is true, leaving out of consideration entirely evidence of the unsuccessful party in conflict therewith, and give to the evidence of the successful party every favorable inference which may be reasonably and fairly drawn from it. * * ” Craver v. Craver, Wyo., 601 P.2d 999, 1001 (1979).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““Cases shall not be continued upon stipulation of counsel alone, but such continuances may be allowed by order of court. No such continuance shall be allowed except for good cause shown.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.