Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

601 So. 2d 1112

Copeland v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · decided 1992-07-24

Relies on 601 So. 2d 1110 - Copeland v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1992-07-24

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently August 2010

6 state decisions

40199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ON RETURN TO REMAND

McMILLAN, Judge.

¶2We remanded this cause to the trial court with instructions to forward to the appellant the forms necessary to file a Rule 32, A.R.Cr.P., petition, asserting the claims he had sought to raise by way of petition for writ of habeas corpus. 601 So.2d 1110 (Ala.Cr.App.1992). According to the trial court’s return, the appellant has been instructed to obtain the Rule 32 form from the department of corrections and to file it with the trial court within 30 days. Because the appellant will have an opportunity to present his claims to the trial court, this cause is due to be, and it is hereby, dismissed.

¶3APPEAL DISMISSED.

All Judges concur.
/601/so2d/1112 · .json · Public domain