Rose v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
54 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 54 later decisions — most recently February 2019 · most notably 615 So. 2d 688 - Spencer v. State (1993), 622 So. 2d 982 - Huff v. State (1993)
54 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Energy Cooperative, Inc. v. Phillips Petroleum Co. · Barrett v. United States · Odend'Hal v. · Clozza v. Bair · State Ex Rel. Davis v. Parks
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 54 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“more dangerous and destructive of the impartiality of the judiciary than a one-sided communication between a judge and a single litigant.”
13 later decisions quote this exact passage“[t]his Court is committed to the doctrine that every litigant is entitled to nothing less than the cold neutrality of an impartial judge. . . . The exercise of any other policy tends to discredit the judiciary and shadow the administration of justice. . . . The attitude of the judge and the atmosphere of the court room should indeed be such that no matter what charge is lodged against a litigant or what cause he is called on to litigate, he can approach the bar with every assurance that he is in a forum where the judicial ermine is everything that it typifies, purity and justice. The guaranty of a fair and impartial trial can mean nothing less than this.”
8 later decisions quote this exact passage“a judge should not engage in any conversation about a pending case with only one of the parties participating in that conversation. Obviously, we understand that this would not include strictly administrative matters not dealing in any way with the merits of the case.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Rodriguez v. State · Smith v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.