Pierre v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
September 2003
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 101 So. 2d 797 - Ferrara v. State · Strawn v. State Ex Rel. Anderberg · 106 So. 2d 424 - Shoultz v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“While allowing jurors to ask questions of witnesses is permissible, it is hard to discern the benefit of such practice when weighed against the endless potential for error.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Culkin
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.