Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 601 So. 2d 1321 - State v. Paille

601 So. 2d 1321 - State v. Paille’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
2
states following
July 2011
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently July 2011

1 federal appellate · 7 state decisions

40199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on American States Insurance v. Piasecki · 549 So. 2d 1005 - Ranger Ins. Co. v. Bal Harbour Club · 513 So. 2d 122 - State v. Fundora · Doerr v. State · 381 So. 2d 1146 - Cotita v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “CHARACTER EVIDENCE; WHEN ADMISSIBLE [[Image here]] (2) OTHER CRIMES, WRONGS, OR ACTS.— (a) Similar fact evidence of other crimes, wrongs, or acts is admissible when relevant to prove a material fact in issue, such as proof of motive, opportunity, intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, identity, or absence of mistake or accident, but it is inadmissible when the evidence is relevant solely to prove bad character or propensity.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Evidence of prior sexual misconduct toward children has been held admissible in such cases to show a pattern of criminality, motive, intent, a lustful state of mind toward the victim, and the relationship between the victim and the offender.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “The test of admissibility of a juvenile confession is the totality of the circumstances under which it was taken.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.