601 So. 2d 213 - AH v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
April 1999
most recently cited
15 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Ex Parte ACK Radio Supply Company of Georgia · 540 So. 2d 740 - Ex Parte Brown · Pridgen v. Head · 505 So. 2d 1306 - Shedd v. State · 466 So. 2d 81 - Ex Parte Anonymous
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"At no time during the transfer hearing or in A.H.'s motion for reconsideration did A.H. or defense counsel object to the court's alleged failure to consider the six factors delineated in § 12-15-34(d), Code of Alabama 1975. Where there is no objection, and therefore no adverse ruling from the trial court on an issue, the issue is waived. Shedd v. State, 505 So.2d 1306 (Ala.Cr.App.1987)." A.H. v. State, 601 So.2d 213, 215 (Ala.Cr.App. 1992). See also M.B. v. State, 630 So.2d 490 (Ala.Cr.App.1993).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“"A.H.'s juvenile probation officer filed a certification report, which notes the extent and nature of A.H.'s prior record and which is included in the record considered by the trial court at the transfer hearing. At the transfer hearing, moreover, testimony was taken as to A.H.'s prior criminal history. It would therefore appear that the trial court did consider the nature and extent of prior delinquency record in determining whether the motion to transfer should be granted."”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. S.B. v. State · Ex Parte SB“[t]he failure of the court to afford the juvenile the explanations required by Rule 24 [Ala.R.Juv.P.] will constitute reversible error upon proper and timely objection.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ex Parte SB
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.