601 So. 2d 281 - Rouse v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
11 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 545 So. 2d 838 - Lambert v. State · Ree v. State · 563 So. 2d 622 - Joint Ventures, Inc. v. Dept. of Transp. · 527 So. 2d 1380 - Florida Bar v. Mullins · 596 So. 2d 73 - Judge v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[r]ule 3.800(a) is reserved for a narrow class of cases in which the sentence imposed can be described as truly `illegal' as a matter of law, for example, where the sentence imposed exceeds the statutory maximum sentence for the crime charged,”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.