601 So. 2d 540 - Taylor v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
30 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently November 2011 · most notably 760 So. 2d 89 - Maddox v. State (2000), Davis v. State (1995)
30 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 576 So. 2d 281 - State v. Williams · 475 So. 2d 1218 - Hendrix v. State · 405 So. 2d 418 - Jollie v. State · 581 So. 2d 1305 - State v. James · 448 So. 2d 1013 - State v. Rhoden
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“prior offenses committed within a close temporal proximity may be a basis for departure when found in conjunction with any one of the three factors outlined in Barfield.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“apparent on the face of the record do not require a contemporaneous objection in order to be preserved for review.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.