Witherspoon v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
February 2004
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 586 So. 2d 1058 - Flowers v. State · 525 So. 2d 964 - Johnson v. State · 556 So. 2d 1239 - Jenkins v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We assume the Florida statute in effect when Witherspoon committed his Texas robberies is the `parallel' or `analogous' statute referred to by rule 3.701.d.5(a)(2). But even if the current statute, which breaks robbery into degree crimes is the point of reference, Witherspoon has no valid complaint.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“When scoring federal, foreign, military, or out-of-state convictions, assign the score for the analogous or parallel Florida Statute.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.