Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 601 So. 2d 775 - State v. Harris

601 So. 2d 775 - State v. Harris’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
September 2012
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently September 2012

7 state decisions

40199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Boykin v. Alabama · State v. Sepulvado · 454 So. 2d 93 - State v. Nuccio · 572 So. 2d 1166 - State v. Greer · 416 So. 2d 82 - State Ex Rel. LaFleur v. Donnelly

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The Court: The range of penalty is zero to forty? [Defense counsel]: Five to forty, your Honor. The Court: Five to forty. [Defense counsel]: Two of which—at least two of which must be without benefit of probation, parole, or suspension of sentence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The trial judge reminded defendant that there had been a preliminary examination and asked him if defendant had been present for it and if the testimony given at that examination had been true and correct. To both questions, defendant answered,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “The trial judge then carefully advised defendant of his rights: against self-incrimination, to a trial by jury and to confront his accusers. The trial judge asked defendant who made the final decision to plead guilty; and defendant answered,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.