Arrambide v. Arrambide’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 10 U.S.C. § 1447 (Military Survivor Benefits Improvement Act of 1989) · 38 U.S.C. § 3101 · 38 U.S.C. § 3105 · 45 U.S.C. § 228A
Relies on Hisquierdo v. Hisquierdo · Busby v. Busby · Cearley v. Cearley · Eichelberger v. Eichelberger · Taggart v. Taggart
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`Nonassignability and exempt status of benefits `Payments of benefits due or to become due under any law administered by the Veterans Administration shall not be assignable except to the extent specifically authorized by law, and such payments shall be exempt from taxation, shall be exempt from the claim of creditors, and shall not be liable to attachment, levy, or seizure by or under any legal or equitable process whatever, either before or after receipt by the beneficiary.' Emphasis supplied.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.