Inzer v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently September 2014
4 federal appellate · 7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Johnson v. State · 109 Tex. Crim. 355 - Deuschle v. State · 66 Tex. Crim. 550 - Bowles v. State · Waddell v. State · 87 Tex. Crim. 267 - Rosebud v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is the unbroken line of authority in this state that a party has a right to carry his pistol home, to his residence, or place of business under legitimate circumstances. If appellant got the pistol at Alto from his brother, to whom he loaned it, and carried it to Nacogdoches [his home], it would not constitute a violation of the law. It is unnecessary to discuss the question as to whether he was a traveler or not. He had a right to take his pistol home, and this would not be violative of the statute. Id. at 1093 (emphasis added); see also Inzer, 601 S.W.2d at 369 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Birch v. State“statutory defenses that one may carry a weapon at home, on one's business premises, or while traveling” and stating that these”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Chiarini v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.