Remling v. Green’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
states following
December 1997
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Mumma v. Aguirre · Herrera v. Herrera · D_F v. State · Magallon v. State · In the Interest of Kates v. Smith
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“They [the Greens] have adequate housing and appear to be financially and emotionally stable at this time. They were described by references as loving, protective parents for the Remling children. Allegations of medical neglect were invalidated. Photographs revealing bruises on Stacey’s buttocks could not'be validated as abuse, but possibly as a one time incident of over disciplining. The children want to be adopted by the Greens. * * * * * * It is respectfully recommended that Mr. and Mrs. Oliver Green be given leave to adopt the minor children, Elizabeth, Stacey and Richard Remling and that henceforth the children be known as Elizabeth Remling Green, Stacey Remling Green and Richard Remling Green. Both Mrs. Mary Lightfoot and Mr. and Mrs. Daniel Remling, paternal grandparents, should be permitted reasonable visitation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Green v. Remling
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.