In Re Peter M.’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
March 2012
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Taylor v. Commissioner of Mental Health & Mental Retardation · In Re John Joseph V. · In Re Shane T. · In Re Misty Lee H. · In Re Chesley B.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“1-A. Rebuttable presumption. The court may presume that the parent is unwilling or unable to protect the child from jeopardy and these circumstances are unlikely to change within a time which is reasonably calculated to meet the child’s needs if: B. The victim of any of the following crimes was a child for whom the parent was responsible or the victim was a child who was a member of a household lived in or frequented by the parent and the parent has been convicted of: [[Image here]] (7) Gross sexual misconduct.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Sarah T.“the child's ability to integrate back into the parent's home”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.