Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 602 A2D 1161 - In Re Peter M.

In Re Peter M.’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
March 2012
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Taylor v. Commissioner of Mental Health & Mental Retardation · In Re John Joseph V. · In Re Shane T. · In Re Misty Lee H. · In Re Chesley B.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “1-A. Rebuttable presumption. The court may presume that the parent is unwilling or unable to protect the child from jeopardy and these circumstances are unlikely to change within a time which is reasonably calculated to meet the child’s needs if: B. The victim of any of the following crimes was a child for whom the parent was responsible or the victim was a child who was a member of a household lived in or frequented by the parent and the parent has been convicted of: [[Image here]] (7) Gross sexual misconduct.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “the child's ability to integrate back into the parent's home”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.