Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 602 A.2d 521 - Fontaine v. State

Fontaine v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
1
states following
December 2018
most recently cited

21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently December 2018

21 state decisions

80199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Henshaw · State v. Feng · State v. Collazo · State v. Brown · Palmigiano v. Mullen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Because the trial justice was presented with conflicting testimony and evidence, he was able to make sound credibility findings by assessing the facts and the totality of the circumstances before him.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““At such an evidentiary hearing the trial justice may consider the proposed recanted accusation of the complaining witnesses and may assess the credibility thereof. The trial justice may further weigh the credibility of these statements in light of the defendant’s admissions in open court or by affidavit of the factual basis for his plea. We do not believe that this process may be carried out without taking the testimony of witnesses at an evidentiary hearing.” Id. at 625 (emphasis added).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “"[t]his is part of the evidence involved in the credibility issue that the trial justice weighed in his determination. * * * The fact that the complaining witnesses did not initially testify to the charges alleged in open court does not automatically discredit their original charges of criminal conduct perpetrated by the applicant.” Id.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.