Needleman v. Bohlen’s Empirical Analysis
602 F.2d 1 · 1979
Citation profile
17 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently July 1995
17 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth · Mathews v. Eldridge · Wolff v. McDonnell · Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. Doyle · Perry v. Sindermann
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We hold that the procedures afforded appellant were constitutionally adequate. She had full notice of the charges against her and a chance to meet those charges in writing. Since these procedures are for the use of well-educated individuals, there is no reason to think that they cannot express their position on paper. See Matthews v. Eldridge, supra, 424 U.S. at 344, 96 S.Ct. at 907. This is especially so given her full access to information in her file and prior notice of the charges, permitting her to mold her response. Id. at 345^46, 96 S.Ct. at 908.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.