Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 602 F.2d 1192 - United States v. Grassi

United States v. Grassi’s Empirical Analysis

602 F.2d 1192 · 1979

Citation profile

50
cited by 50 later decisions
6
states following
January 2017
most recently cited

32 federal appellate · 2 district · 8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 50 later decisions — most recently January 2017 · most notably State v. Maurer (1984), United States v. Thevis (1982)

32 federal appellate · 2 district · 8 state decisions

36019791980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 18 U.S.C. § 371

Relies on Miller v. California · Cardillo v. United States · United States v. Beechum · Abel v. United States · Lustig v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “of the legitimate moral force of his evidence,”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Although relevant, evidence may be excluded if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or misleading the jury, or by considerations of undue delay, waste of time, or needless presentation of cumulative evidence.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “to exclude evidence under Rule 403 is 'committed to the sound discretion of the trial court,' [and] [a]n offer to stipulate is one factor that the trial court should consider in making [that] determination....”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.