Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 602 F.2d 167 - Johnson v. Mabry

Johnson v. Mabry’s Empirical Analysis

602 F.2d 167 · 1979

Citation profile

44
cited by 44 later decisions
5
states following
October 2019
most recently cited

29 federal appellate · 1 district · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently October 2019 · most notably Paxton v. Union National Bank (1982), United States v. Villano (1987)

29 federal appellate · 1 district · 5 state decisions

21019791980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Johnson v. Zerbst · Ex parte Lange · Hill v. United States ex rel. Wampler · Rowley v. Welch

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the oral sentence pronounced by the sentencing judge constitutes the judgment, and anything inconsistent with the judgment which is included in a commitment order is a nullity.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““It is well settled that a trial court lacks jurisdiction to alter a previously imposed valid sentence once the defendant begins to serve the sentence, and for the court to subsequently alter a sentence places the defendant in double jeopardy.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “an appellate court has the right to interpret such evidence independently.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.