Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 602 F.3d 1364 - Clearplay, Inc. v. Abecassis

Clearplay, Inc. v. Abecassis’s Empirical Analysis

602 F.3d 1364 · 2010

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
June 2018
most recently cited

2 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1295 · 28 U.S.C. § 1338 · 28 U.S.C. § 1631

Relies on Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Taylor · Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp. · Pratt v. Paris Gaslight Coke Co · Hunter Douglas, Inc. v. Harmonic Design, Inc. · Dow Chemical Co. v. Exxon Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he first part of the Christianson test is plainly not satisfied”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “entirely devoted to state law causes of action.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.