Anacassus v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis
602 F.3d 14 · 2010
Citation profile
12 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1158 (§ 208 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (§ 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on United States v. Zannino · Fatin v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Aguilar-Solis v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Laeila Nelson Stephanie Nelson Phil Nelson v. Immigration and Naturalization Service · Bocova v. Gonzales
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[I]solated beatings, even when rather severe, do not establish systematic mistreatment needed to show persecution.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“any reasonable adjudicator would be compelled to conclude to the contrary.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“reasonable, substantial, and probative evidence”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Barsoum v. Holder
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.