Stanley v. Vining’s Empirical Analysis
602 F.3d 767 · 2010
Citation profile
4 federal appellate ·
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Ohio Northern Bankruptcy Court)
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1915 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Wolff v. McDonnell · Parratt v. Taylor · Daniels v. Williams · Hudson v. Palmer · Lewis Director Arizona Department of Corrections v. Casey
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]t has long been established that the violation of a state statute or regulation is insufficient alone to make a claim cognizable under § 1983.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.