602 F. Supp. 430 - Lucash v. Strick Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 8 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently March 2017 · most notably Abnathya v. Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc. (1993), Mitchell v. Eastman Kodak Co. (1997)
7 federal appellate · 8 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 1001 (§ 2 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 1109 (§ 409 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 1132 (§ 502 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 1133 (§ 503 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 1140 (§ 510 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 1144 (§ 514 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 185 (§ 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 (Taft-Hartley Act))
Relies on Conley v. Gibson · United States v. Diebold, Inc. · Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc. · Jenkins v. McKeithen · Alessi v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.