Diamond v. McKenzie’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently June 2004
5 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 20 U.S.C. § 1400 (Education for All Handicapped Children Act of 1975) · 20 U.S.C. § 1401 · 20 U.S.C. § 1415 · 29 U.S.C. § 794 · 29 U.S.C. § 794A · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 1988
Relies on Alyeska Pipeline Service Company v. Wilderness Society · F. D. Rich Co. v. United States Ex Rel. Industrial Lumber Co. · Smith v. Robinson · 594 F. Supp. 407 - Tschanneral v. District of Columbia Board of Education
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“subject children and their parents to an additional step not required by the EHA”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[t]his Memorandum Opinion constitutes the Court's ruling on the motion to dismiss....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Diamond v. McKenzie“[a]n appropriate order consistent with this Memorandum Opinion has issued,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Diamond v. McKenzie
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.